Start Your FREE Membership NOW
 Discover Proven Ways to Be a Better Medical Office Manager
 Get Our Weekly eNewsletter, MOMAlert, and MUCH MORE
 Absolutely NO Risk or Obligation on Your Part -- It's FREE!
EMAIL ADDRESS



Upgrade to Premium Membership NOW for Just $90!
Get 3 Months of Full Premium Membership Access
Includes Our Monthly Newsletter, Office Toolbox, Policy Center, and Archives
Plus, You Get FREE Webinars, and MUCH MORE!
INSIGHT

With the right effort, even difficult employee issues can be solved

By Steve M. Cohen  bio

An employee who had been terminated from one of my client organizations later called the whistleblower/action hotline.

She was using the hotline in an attempt to retrieve her job or, at least, to vent her anger and frustration at the situation. I listened and discovered that she had been terminated for frequent violations of the office dress code. What I heard raised no concerns for her ex-employer. What did the employee expect when she showed up for work dressed like she just came from a nightclub (tight dress, revealing neck and hem lines—you get the picture).

I had a long conversation with this person in an attempt to calm her and communicate that I cared. I’m not heartless and I suspect the person actually doesn’t realize that dress codes matter. I told her that such issues are sticky because choice of clothing at work conveys taste and includes issues of style, all of which is very subjective. Wardrobe choices in social situations are made to communicate one message while, at work, they should convey an altogether different message.

Managers do not want distractions or drama at work or anything that pulls employees’ attention away from productivity and performance. I advised her that employers want employees’ wardrobe choices (and other outward factors) to communicate professionalism, not sexuality. Managers (smart ones, at least) do not want their employees to treat other employees as sexual beings but rather as professional contributors. And, employers actually have a very serious obligation to create a zone at work that is free from unwelcomed sexuality related behavior.

All of this was meant to help this terminated employee understand that she was being heard by someone who cared about her and her situation. If the opposite message had been communicated, then she would be very likely to keep going in her search for someone who will listen and care—someone like the State Human Rights Commission or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

In all likelihood, this termination would not result in a sustainable wrongful discharge lawsuit, but it could. It is “anybody’s game” whenever one goes into the legal system. What is certain is that if this person did go to the outside agencies that are available and free of charge to the complainant, it would cost the ex-employer in money, worry, and time away from work to defend the decision to terminate.

Knowing the law and creating the right environment is important. It’s also important that employers respond in the right way when issues arise.


Steve M. Cohen, Ed.D., CMC is President/Partner of Labor Management Advisory Group, Inc. and HR Solutions: On-Call, both based in Kansas City, MO. For more information, visit www.laborgroup.com or call (913) 927-0229.


The above information is shared by a guest contributor and does not necessarily reflect the views of Medical Office Manager.

Close

EMAIL ADDRESS


PASSWORD
EMAIL ADDRESS

FIRST NAME

LAST NAME

TITLE

COMPANY

PHONE

Try Premium Membership

(-0)